高师院校教师教育师范性与学术性之争的再认识
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

G650

基金项目:

南充市社会科学研究“十三五”规划2019 年度项目“老中师培养模式对卓越全科教师培养的启示研究”( 编号: NC2019C097) 的阶段性研究成果。


Reconsideration of the Controversy Between Academic and Teacher Trainingin Normal Universities
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    高师院校教师教育师范性与学术性之争是伴随着“高师改大”运动而产生的基础性的老问题。之所以如此,主要是由于人们对师范性与学术性争论的焦点多数集中在高师教师教育专业性的认识上而忽视了师范性与学术性之间内在属性的逻辑联系。教学学术的独立性、基础性与学科学术系统化、高深性构成了师范性与学术性二者内在属性差异。首先,通过对高师院校师范性与学术性之争的现实表征和本质进行深度解析,提出应正确认识师范性与学术性之争的必然性,进一步厘清师范性与学术性之争的学理基础;其次,在管理层面应专注师范性与学术性内容的深度整合,构建分类培养、统一管理的立体复合式人才管育模式;最后,在评价层面应观照学科学术与教学学术评价标准的多维创新,建立学科支撑专业、科研反哺教学的教师质量评价机制。

    Abstract:

    The dispute between teacher education and academic nature of teacher education in normal universities is a basic and old problem that accompanies the movement of“reform from normal universities to universities”. The reason for this is mainly because the focus of the debate between teacher education and academic education is mostly on people’s understanding of the professional edu- cation of teachers in higher normal education,while ignoring the logical connection between the inherent attributes of teacher education and academic education. The independence,basicity of teaching and learning,the systematic and advanced nature of academic disci- plines constitute the inherent difference between teacher - oriented and academic nature. To this end,through in - depth analysis of the actual representation and essence of the dispute between teacher - training and academic in normal universities,it is proposed that the inevitability of the dispute between teacher - training and academic should be correctly understood,and the theoretical basis for the dis- pute between teacher - training and academic should be further clarified; Secondly,at the management level,we should focus on the in - depth integration of teacher - oriented and academic content,and build a three - dimensional and compound talent management mod- el with categorized training and unified management; finally,at the evaluation level,we should take care of the multi - dimensional in- novation of academic and teaching academic evaluation standards. Establish a teacher quality evaluation mechanism that supports disci- plines and scientific research back - feeding teaching.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-05
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-08-23
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第位访问者     版权所有:黑龙江高教研究编辑部    
主办单位:哈尔滨师范大学;黑龙江省高教学会
     地址:哈尔滨市利民经济开发区师大南路1号       邮编:150025      电话 :0451-88060218      
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司